[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:10:52 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-patch-test@...ts.linaro.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kernel/trace:check the val against the available mem
On Wed 04-04-18 08:59:01, Steven Rostedt wrote:
[...]
> + /*
> + * Check if the available memory is there first.
> + * Note, si_mem_available() only gives us a rough estimate of available
> + * memory. It may not be accurate. But we don't care, we just want
> + * to prevent doing any allocation when it is obvious that it is
> + * not going to succeed.
> + */
> + i = si_mem_available();
> + if (i < nr_pages)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
>
> Better?
I must be really missing something here. How can that work at all for
e.g. the zone_{highmem/movable}. You will get false on the above tests
even when you will have hard time to allocate anything from your
destination zones.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists