[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-c21c8548-7183-480c-ba39-00007856d118@palmer-si-x1c4>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 08:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] irq updates for 4.17
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 03:19:54 PDT (-0700), tglx@...utronix.de wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:51 PM, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks! The linked patch set should be fully bisectable, while this one
>> > will fail on some ARM randconfigs.
>>
>> If it's only some (not very realistic) randconfigs, I suspect an
>> incremental fix is probably the easier solution, rather than redoing
>> that whole branch.
>>
>> So mind at least sending that incremental fix on top of the branch to
>> Thomas and making his life easier if he decides to go that way?
>>
>> And if Thomas is busy doing something else (*), and I come back to
>> this tomorrow as-is, I'd want to pull his tree and just apply the
>> incremental fix anyway, so it makes sense to send it to me as well.
>>
>> Linus
>>
>> (*) I have long since accepted that some people have a life outside of
>> kernel development too, and don't always reply immediately. I may not
>> _understand_ it, but I am resigned to the fact.
>
> I briefly returned from that other life and applied the 3 patches on top
> after massaging the changelogs a bit and pushed everything out for you to
> pull.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Works for me. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists