lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACdnJuvFqXGLsAv1Km3MmdssHBfuH5-C_vG3A4eq4Yuj0HhFBA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:10:47 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: luto@...nel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, jmorris@...ei.org, Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jforbes@...hat.com, linux-man@...r.kernel.org, jlee@...e.com, LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Kernel lockdown for secure boot On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:06 PM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com> wrote: > > > > Ok. So we can build distribution kernels that *always* have this on, and to > > turn it off you have to disable Secure Boot and install a different kernel. > Bingo. > Exactly like EVERY OTHER KERNEL CONFIG OPTION. So your argument is that we should make the user experience worse? Without some sort of verified boot mechanism, lockdown is just security theater. There's no good reason to enable it unless you have some mechanism for verifying that you booted something you trust.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists