[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 23:07:02 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] afs: Be more aggressive in retiring cached vnodes
When relinquishing cookies, either due to iget failure or to inode
eviction, retire a cookie if we think the corresponding vnode got deleted
on the server rather than just letting it lie in the cache.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
fs/afs/inode.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/afs/inode.c b/fs/afs/inode.c
index 42f83fd5a896..c942c79fc5f0 100644
--- a/fs/afs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/afs/inode.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ struct inode *afs_iget(struct super_block *sb, struct key *key,
/* failure */
bad_inode:
#ifdef CONFIG_AFS_FSCACHE
- fscache_relinquish_cookie(vnode->cache, 0);
+ fscache_relinquish_cookie(vnode->cache, ret == -ENOENT);
vnode->cache = NULL;
#endif
iget_failed(inode);
@@ -511,7 +511,8 @@ void afs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_AFS_FSCACHE
- fscache_relinquish_cookie(vnode->cache, 0);
+ fscache_relinquish_cookie(vnode->cache,
+ test_bit(AFS_VNODE_DELETED, &vnode->flags));
vnode->cache = NULL;
#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists