[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180405072105.egwq2pg26np3l7pb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 09:21:05 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, efault@....de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, matt@...eblueprint.co.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Fix rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP
warning
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 09:15:39AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Apr 2018, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >
> > > The case for the rt task throttling (which this workload also hits) can be ignored in
> > > that the skip_update call is actually bogus and quite the contrary (the request bits
> > > are removed/reverted).
> >
> > While at it, how about this trivial patch?
> >
> > ----8<--------------------------------------------------------
> > [PATCH 2/1] sched: Simplify helpers for rq clock update skip requests
> >
> > By renaming the functions we can get rid of the skip parameter
> > and have better code redability. It makes zero sense to have
> > things such as:
> >
> > rq_clock_skip_update(rq, false)
> >
> > When the skip request is in fact not going to happen. Ever. Rename
> > things such that we end up with:
> >
> > rq_clock_skip_update(rq)
> > rq_clock_cancel_skipupdate(rq)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
>
> Works for me :-)
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
I have applied both patches, thanks guys!
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists