[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180405002605.GC10487@animx.eu.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 20:26:05 -0400
From: Wakko Warner <wakko@...mx.eu.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"richard.weinberger@...il.com" <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.15.14 crash with iscsi target and dvd
Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-04-01 at 14:27 -0400, Wakko Warner wrote:
> > Wakko Warner wrote:
> > > Wakko Warner wrote:
> > > > I tested 4.14.32 last night with the same oops. 4.9.91 works fine.
> > > > From the initiator, if I do cat /dev/sr1 > /dev/null it works. If I mount
> > > > /dev/sr1 and then do find -type f | xargs cat > /dev/null the target
> > > > crashes. I'm using the builtin iscsi target with pscsi. I can burn from
> > > > the initiator with out problems. I'll test other kernels between 4.9 and
> > > > 4.14.
> > >
> > > So I've tested 4.x.y where x one of 10 11 12 14 15 and y is the latest patch
> > > (except for 4.15 which was 1 behind)
> > > Each of these kernels crash within seconds or immediate of doing find -type
> > > f | xargs cat > /dev/null from the initiator.
> >
> > I tried 4.10.0. It doesn't completely lockup the system, but the device
> > that was used hangs. So from the initiator, it's /dev/sr1 and from the
> > target it's /dev/sr0. Attempting to read /dev/sr0 after the oops causes the
> > process to hang in D state.
>
> Hello Wakko,
>
> Thank you for having narrowed down this further. I think that you encountered
> a regression either in the block layer core or in the SCSI core. Unfortunately
> the number of changes between kernel versions v4.9 and v4.10 in these two
> subsystems is huge. I see two possible ways forward:
> - Either that you perform a bisect to identify the patch that introduced this
> regression. However, I'm not sure whether you are familiar with the bisect
> process.
> - Or that you identify the command that triggers this crash such that others
> can reproduce this issue without needing access to your setup.
>
> How about reproducing this crash with the below patch applied on top of
> kernel v4.15.x? The additional output sent by this patch to the system log
> should allow us to reproduce this issue by submitting the same SCSI command
> with sg_raw.
Sorry for not getting back in touch. My internet was down. I haven't tried
the patch yet. I'll try to get to that tomorrow. The system with the issue
is busy and I can't reboot it right now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists