[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bed16723-6bf0-4bcf-f44c-ebcf7a1e7cc5@rock-chips.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 08:51:14 +0800
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
To: Ryan Grachek <ryan@...ted.us>
Cc: shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc-k3: Fix DDR52 mode by setting required clock
divisor
[+ Zhangfei Gao who added support for hi6220]
On 2018/4/4 23:31, Ryan Grachek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:31 AM, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com
> <mailto:shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>> wrote:
>
> On 2018/3/30 2:24, oscardagrach wrote:
>
> Need at least one line commit body.
>
> Signed-off-by: oscardagrach <ryan@...ted.us <mailto:ryan@...ted.us>>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
> b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
> index 89cdb3d533bb..efc546cb4db8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
> @@ -194,8 +194,14 @@ static void dw_mci_hi6220_set_ios(struct
> dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> int ret;
> unsigned int clock;
> - clock = (ios->clock <= 25000000) ? 25000000 : ios->clock;
> -
> + /* CLKDIV must be 1 for DDR52/8-bit mode */
> + if (ios->bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8 &&
> + ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52) {
> + mci_writel(host, CLKDIV, 0x1);
> + clock = ios->clock;
> + } else {
> + clock = (ios->clock <= 25000000) ? 25000000 :
> ios->clock;
> + }
>
>
> I undertand DDR52/8-bit need CLKDIV fixed 1, but shouldn't the following
> change is more sensible?
>
> if (ios->bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8 && ios->timing ==
> MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52)
> clock = ios->clock * 2;
> else
> clock = (ios->clock <= 25000000) ? 25000000 : ios->clock;
>
>
> The reason is ios->clock is 52MHz and you could claim 104MHz from the
> clock provider and let dw_mmc core take care of the divder to be 1.
> Otherwise, you just force it to be DDR52/8-bit with a clk rate of 26MHz.
>
>
> ret = clk_set_rate(host->biu_clk, clock);
> if (ret)
> dev_warn(host->dev, "failed to set rate
> %uHz\n", clock);
>
>
>
For future wise, please use plain mode mail, but not HTML format.
> Your feedback is correct. I see the Rockchip dwmmc driver has a similar
> implementation. After applying your suggested changes, however, my board
> reports "dwmmc_k3 f723d000.dwmmc0: failed to set rate 104000000Hz"
> during intialization of eMMC. In addition, I do not see CLKDIV being
> set to 1. clk_set_rate fails and I wonder if this is out-of-scope of
> the driver.
>
> If I set CLKDIV where I did prior, with your changes, the device fails
> to set the clock and falls back to 52 MHz (26 MHz) and works fine, but
> again, CLKDIV is reported as 0 (even though it is 1.) One thing of
> interest to note is when I manually set the clock by doing:
> (echo 104000000 > /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0/clock) the device reports back
> 'mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 198400000Hz (slot req 104000000Hz,
> actual 99200000HZ div = 1)' which works reliably and clk_set_rate does
> not report any error.
>
When looking closely into the code, at least dw_mci_hi6220_set_ios
goes wrong with the bus_hz, since it should be ciu_clk but not biu_clk.
"b" stands for bus, and "c" stands for card IMHO, however bus_hz
describs the clock to the card, provided by controller. Does the
following patch help?
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
index 89cdb3d..9e78cf2 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
@@ -194,13 +194,21 @@ static void dw_mci_hi6220_set_ios(struct dw_mci
*host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
int ret;
unsigned int clock;
- clock = (ios->clock <= 25000000) ? 25000000 : ios->clock;
+ if (ios->bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8 &&
+ ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52)
+ clock = ios->clock * 2;
+ else
+ clock = (ios->clock <= 25000000) ? 25000000 : ios->clock;
- ret = clk_set_rate(host->biu_clk, clock);
+ ret = clk_set_rate(host->ciu_clk, clock);
if (ret)
dev_warn(host->dev, "failed to set rate %uHz\n", clock);
- host->bus_hz = clk_get_rate(host->biu_clk);
+ clock = clk_get_rate(host->ciu_clk);
+ if (clock != host->bus_hz) {
+ host->bus_hz = clock;
+ host->current_speed = 0;
+ }
}
> I am not sure where to begin debugging these clock issues and welcome
> any feedback.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists