linux-kernel - Re: sched_rt_period_timer causing large latencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180405200859.19fceb95@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Apr 2018 20:08:59 +1000
From:   Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To:     Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: sched_rt_period_timer causing large latencies

On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:40:20 +0200
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:

> On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 10:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:11:38AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:  
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I'm seeing some pretty big latencies on a ~idle system when a CPU wakes
> > > out of a nohz idle. Looks like it's due to the taking a lot of remote
> > > locks and cache lines. irqoff trace:  
> > 
> > On RT I think we default RT_RUNTIME_SHARE to false, maybe we should do
> > the same for mainline.  
> 
> Probably.  My very first enterprise encounter with the thing was it NOT
> saving a box from it's not so clever driver due to that.

Well I would think a simpler per-cpu limiter might actually stand a
better chance of saving you there. Or even something attached to the
softlockup watchdog.

I'm still getting a lot of locks coming from sched_rt_period_timer
with RT_RUNTIME_SHARE false, it's just that it's now down to about
NR_CPUS locks rather than 3*NR_CPUS.

Thanks,
Nick