lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Apr 2018 13:12:12 +0200
From:   David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>
To:     Zhang Zhuoyu <zhangzhuoyu@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc:     nab@...ux-iscsi.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] target:separate tx/rx cmd_puds

Hi,

The commit summary has a typo (cmd_puds). That said, this change
isn't iSCSI specific, so using "pdu" here doesn't make much sense IMO.

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:52:43 +0800, Zhang Zhuoyu wrote:

> Separate tx/rx cmd_pdus in order to distinguish LUN read/write IOPS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Zhuoyu <zhangzhuoyu@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
>  drivers/target/target_core_stat.c      | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  include/target/target_core_base.h      |  3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_stat.c b/drivers/target/target_core_stat.c
> index f0db91e..9099494 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_stat.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_stat.c
> @@ -706,7 +722,8 @@ static ssize_t target_stat_tgt_port_hs_in_cmds_show(struct config_item *item,
>  CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, indx);
>  CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, name);
>  CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, port_index);
> -CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, in_cmds);
> +CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, tx_cmds);
> +CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, rx_cmds);

I don't think the in_cmds metric should be deleted here. It could be
calculated on the fly via tx_cmds + rx_cmds + nodata_cmds.

Cheers, David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists