[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f809296-e88d-1090-0027-890782b91d6e@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 20:44:12 +0800
From: Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
Philip Derrin <philip@....systems>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@....com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@...el.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
Daniel Vacek <neelx@...hat.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Jia He <jia.he@...-semitech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] arm: arm64: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary
search in memblock_next_valid_pfn()
On 4/5/2018 7:34 PM, Matthew Wilcox Wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:04:35AM -0700, Jia He wrote:
>> Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns
>> where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But there is
>> still some room for improvement. E.g. if pfn and pfn+1 are in the same
>> memblock region, we can simply pfn++ instead of doing the binary search
>> in memblock_next_valid_pfn.
> Sure, but I bet if we are >end_pfn, we're almost certainly going to the
> start_pfn of the next block, so why not test that as well?
>
>> + /* fast path, return pfn+1 if next pfn is in the same region */
>> + if (early_region_idx != -1) {
>> + start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(regions[early_region_idx].base);
>> + end_pfn = PFN_DOWN(regions[early_region_idx].base +
>> + regions[early_region_idx].size);
>> +
>> + if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn < end_pfn)
>> + return pfn;
> early_region_idx++;
> start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(regions[early_region_idx].base);
> if (pfn >= end_pfn && pfn <= start_pfn)
> return start_pfn;
Thanks, thus the binary search in next step can be discarded?
--
Cheers,
Jia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists