lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:40:27 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Tal Gilboa <talgi@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the pci tree

Hi all,

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:14:54 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   2907938d2375 ("net/mlx5e: Use pcie_bandwidth_available() to compute bandwidth")
> 
> from the pci tree and commit:
> 
>   0608d4dbaf4e ("net/mlx5e: Unify slow PCI heuristic")
> 
> from the net-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> index 884337f88589,0aab3afc6885..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> @@@ -3880,16 -4026,50 +4033,20 @@@ void mlx5e_build_default_indir_rqt(u32 
>   		indirection_rqt[i] = i % num_channels;
>   }
>   
> - static bool cqe_compress_heuristic(u32 link_speed, u32 pci_bw)
>  -static int mlx5e_get_pci_bw(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, u32 *pci_bw)
>  -{
>  -	enum pcie_link_width width;
>  -	enum pci_bus_speed speed;
>  -	int err = 0;
>  -
>  -	err = pcie_get_minimum_link(mdev->pdev, &speed, &width);
>  -	if (err)
>  -		return err;
>  -
>  -	if (speed == PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN || width == PCIE_LNK_WIDTH_UNKNOWN)
>  -		return -EINVAL;
>  -
>  -	switch (speed) {
>  -	case PCIE_SPEED_2_5GT:
>  -		*pci_bw = 2500 * width;
>  -		break;
>  -	case PCIE_SPEED_5_0GT:
>  -		*pci_bw = 5000 * width;
>  -		break;
>  -	case PCIE_SPEED_8_0GT:
>  -		*pci_bw = 8000 * width;
>  -		break;
>  -	default:
>  -		return -EINVAL;
>  -	}
>  -
>  -	return 0;
>  -}
>  -
> + static bool slow_pci_heuristic(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
>   {
> - 	return (link_speed && pci_bw &&
> - 		(pci_bw < 40000) && (pci_bw < link_speed));
> - }
> + 	u32 link_speed = 0;
> + 	u32 pci_bw = 0;
>   
> - static bool hw_lro_heuristic(u32 link_speed, u32 pci_bw)
> - {
> - 	return !(link_speed && pci_bw &&
> - 		 (pci_bw <= 16000) && (pci_bw < link_speed));
> + 	mlx5e_get_max_linkspeed(mdev, &link_speed);
>  -	mlx5e_get_pci_bw(mdev, &pci_bw);
> ++	pci_bw = pcie_bandwidth_available(mdev->pdev, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> + 	mlx5_core_dbg_once(mdev, "Max link speed = %d, PCI BW = %d\n",
> + 			   link_speed, pci_bw);
> + 
> + #define MLX5E_SLOW_PCI_RATIO (2)
> + 
> + 	return link_speed && pci_bw &&
> + 		link_speed > MLX5E_SLOW_PCI_RATIO * pci_bw;
>   }
>   
>   void mlx5e_set_tx_cq_mode_params(struct mlx5e_params *params, u8 cq_period_mode)

This is now a conflict between the pci tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists