[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <999e4ee7-2e4e-6bf9-ac76-209e259c83e4@nbd.name>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 16:05:51 +0200
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Ethernet: Add and use ether_<type>_addr globals
On 2018-04-05 15:51, Joe Perches wrote:
>> You have to factor in
>> not just the .text size, but the fact that referencing an exported
>> symbol needs a .reloc entry as well, which also eats up some space (at
>> least when the code is being built as module).
>
> Thanks, the modules I built got smaller.
Please post some numbers to show this. By the way, on other
architectures the numbers will probably be different, especially on
ARM/MIPS.
>> In my opinion, your series probably causes more bloat in common
>> configurations instead of reducing it.
>>
>> You're also touching several places that could easily use
>> eth_broadcast_addr and eth_zero_addr. I think making those changes would
>> be more productive than what you did in this series.
>
> Doubtful. AFAIK: possible unaligned addresses.
Those two are just memset calls, alignment does not matter.
- Felix
Powered by blists - more mailing lists