[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180405175326-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 17:54:40 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, aik@...abs.ru,
jasowang@...hat.com, joe@...ches.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net,
david@...son.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [RFC] virtio: Use DMA MAP API for devices without an IOMMU
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:09:30PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 04:26 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > There are certian platforms which would like to use SWIOTLB based DMA API
> > for bouncing purpose without actually requiring an IOMMU back end. But the
> > virtio core does not allow such mechanism. Right now DMA MAP API is only
> > selected for devices which have an IOMMU and then the QEMU/host back end
> > will process all incoming SG buffer addresses as IOVA instead of simple
> > GPA which is the case for simple bounce buffers after being processed with
> > SWIOTLB API. To enable this usage, it introduces an architecture specific
> > function which will just make virtio core front end select DMA operations
> > structure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> + "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
I'm confused by this.
static bool vring_use_dma_api(struct virtio_device *vdev)
{
if (!virtio_has_iommu_quirk(vdev))
return true;
Why doesn't setting VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM on the
hypervisor side sufficient?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists