lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Apr 2018 17:54:40 +0300
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, aik@...abs.ru,
        jasowang@...hat.com, joe@...ches.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net,
        david@...son.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [RFC] virtio: Use DMA MAP API for devices without an IOMMU

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:09:30PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 04:26 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > There are certian platforms which would like to use SWIOTLB based DMA API
> > for bouncing purpose without actually requiring an IOMMU back end. But the
> > virtio core does not allow such mechanism. Right now DMA MAP API is only
> > selected for devices which have an IOMMU and then the QEMU/host back end
> > will process all incoming SG buffer addresses as IOVA instead of simple
> > GPA which is the case for simple bounce buffers after being processed with
> > SWIOTLB API. To enable this usage, it introduces an architecture specific
> > function which will just make virtio core front end select DMA operations
> > structure.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> + "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>

I'm confused by this.

static bool vring_use_dma_api(struct virtio_device *vdev)
{
        if (!virtio_has_iommu_quirk(vdev))
                return true;


Why doesn't setting VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM on the
hypervisor side sufficient?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists