lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:59:21 +0100
From:   Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To:     <linux-mm@...ck.org>
CC:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] mm/docs: describe memory.low refinements

Refine cgroup v2 docs after latest memory.low changes.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@...com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
---
 Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt b/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt
index f728e55602b2..7ee462b8a6ac 100644
--- a/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt
@@ -1006,10 +1006,17 @@ PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
 	A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
 	cgroups.  The default is "0".
 
-	Best-effort memory protection.  If the memory usages of a
-	cgroup and all its ancestors are below their low boundaries,
-	the cgroup's memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be
-	reclaimed from unprotected cgroups.
+	Best-effort memory protection.  If the memory usage of a
+	cgroup is within its effective low boundary, the cgroup's
+	memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be reclaimed
+	from unprotected cgroups.
+
+	Effective low boundary is limited by memory.low values of
+	all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.low overcommitment
+	(child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory,
+	than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
+	the part of parent's protection proportional to the its
+	actual memory usage below memory.low.
 
 	Putting more memory than generally available under this
 	protection is discouraged.
@@ -2008,17 +2015,8 @@ system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
 becomes self-defeating.
 
 The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
-reserve.  A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it and all its
-ancestors are below their low boundaries, which makes delegation of
-subtrees possible.  Secondly, new cgroups have no reserve per default
-and in the common case most cgroups are eligible for the preferred
-reclaim pass.  This allows the new low boundary to be efficiently
-implemented with just a minor addition to the generic reclaim code,
-without the need for out-of-band data structures and reclaim passes.
-Because the generic reclaim code considers all cgroups except for the
-ones running low in the preferred first reclaim pass, overreclaim of
-individual groups is eliminated as well, resulting in much better
-overall workload performance.
+reserve.  A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it's within its low,
+which makes delegation of subtrees possible.
 
 The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
 limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
-- 
2.14.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists