[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1523039426-3938-6-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 11:30:19 -0700
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, bp@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com,
arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com, asit.k.mallick@...el.com
Subject: [4.15 & 4.14 stable 05/12] x86/microcode/intel: Check microcode revision before updating sibling threads
commit c182d2b7d0ca48e0d6ff16f7d883161238c447ed upstream
After updating microcode on one of the threads of a core, the other
thread sibling automatically gets the update since the microcode
resources on a hyperthreaded core are shared between the two threads.
Check the microcode revision on the CPU before performing a microcode
update and thus save us the WRMSR 0x79 because it is a particularly
expensive operation.
[ Borislav: Massage changelog and coding style. ]
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-2-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-3-bp@alien8.de
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 923054a..87bd6dc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -589,6 +589,17 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
if (!mc)
return 0;
+ /*
+ * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive
+ * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode
+ * already.
+ */
+ rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
+ if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) {
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
+ return UCODE_OK;
+ }
+
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
@@ -776,7 +787,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
{
struct microcode_intel *mc;
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c;
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
static int prev_rev;
u32 rev;
@@ -793,6 +804,18 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
return UCODE_NFOUND;
}
+ /*
+ * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive
+ * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode
+ * already.
+ */
+ rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
+ if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) {
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
+ c->microcode = rev;
+ return UCODE_OK;
+ }
+
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
@@ -813,8 +836,6 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
prev_rev = rev;
}
- c = &cpu_data(cpu);
-
uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
c->microcode = rev;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists