[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180406203812.3087-5-andi@firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 13:38:12 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: acme@...nel.org
Cc: jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] perf, tools, record: Remove suggestion to enable APIC
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
perf record suggests to enable the APIC on errors.
APIC is practically always used today and the problem is usually somewhere else.
Just remove the outdated suggestion.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index 66b62570c855..3e87486c28fe 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -2870,8 +2870,7 @@ int perf_evsel__open_strerror(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct target *target,
#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
if (evsel->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
return scnprintf(msg, size, "%s",
- "No hardware sampling interrupt available.\n"
- "No APIC? If so then you can boot the kernel with the \"lapic\" boot parameter to force-enable it.");
+ "No hardware sampling interrupt available.\n");
#endif
break;
case EBUSY:
--
2.14.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists