[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180406070727.GD8416@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 09:07:27 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 092/134] cpufreq: Fix governor module removal race
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 09:56:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 19:06 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> >
> > [ Upstream commit a8b149d32b663c1a4105273295184b78f53d33cf ]
> [...]
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -551,6 +551,8 @@ static int cpufreq_parse_governor(char *
> > *governor = t;
> > err = 0;
> > }
> > + if (t && !try_module_get(t->owner))
> > + t = NULL;
>
> This won't work because t is dead after this point. The fix appears to
> depend on:
>
> commit 045149e6a22119e5bf0d16a0b24a4173a2abb71d
> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Date: Thu Nov 23 01:23:16 2017 +0100
>
> cpufreq: Clean up cpufreq_parse_governor()
>
> which moves the assignment to *governor further down.
Ick, this also didn't make it into 4.9.y so I'm just reverting it from
everywhere.
thanks for the review!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists