lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 06 Apr 2018 10:11:04 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@...dresden.de>,
        Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] cpuidle: Return nohz hint from cpuidle_select()

On Friday, April 6, 2018 4:44:14 AM CEST Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:39:50AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > Index: linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > +++ linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > @@ -991,6 +991,20 @@ void tick_nohz_irq_exit(void)
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > + * tick_nohz_idle_got_tick - Check whether or not the tick handler has run
> > + */
> > +bool tick_nohz_idle_got_tick(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct tick_sched *ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
> > +
> > +	if (ts->inidle > 1) {
> > +		ts->inidle = 1;
> > +		return true;
> > +	}
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> >   * tick_nohz_get_sleep_length - return the length of the current sleep
> >   *
> >   * Called from power state control code with interrupts disabled
> > @@ -1101,6 +1115,9 @@ static void tick_nohz_handler(struct clo
> >  	struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
> >  	ktime_t now = ktime_get();
> >  
> > +	if (ts->inidle)
> > +		ts->inidle = 2;
> > +
> 
> You can move that to tick_sched_do_timer() to avoid code duplication.
> 
> Also these constants are very opaque. And even with proper symbols it wouldn't look
> right to extend ts->inidle that way.
> 
> Perhaps you should add a field such as ts->got_idle_tick under the boolean fields
> after the below patch:
> 
> --
> From c7b2ca5a4c512517ddfeb9f922d5999f82542ced Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 04:32:37 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] nohz: Gather tick_sched booleans under a common flag field
> 
> This optimize the space and leave plenty of room for further flags.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.h | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.h b/kernel/time/tick-sched.h
> index 954b43d..38f24dc 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.h
> @@ -45,14 +45,17 @@ struct tick_sched {
>  	struct hrtimer			sched_timer;
>  	unsigned long			check_clocks;
>  	enum tick_nohz_mode		nohz_mode;
> +
> +	unsigned int			inidle		: 1;
> +	unsigned int			tick_stopped	: 1;

This particular change breaks build, because tick_stopped is
accessed via __this_cpu_read() in tick_nohz_tick_stopped().

> +	unsigned int			idle_active	: 1;
> +	unsigned int			do_timer_last	: 1;
> +
>  	ktime_t				last_tick;
>  	ktime_t				next_tick;
> -	int				inidle;
> -	int				tick_stopped;
>  	unsigned long			idle_jiffies;
>  	unsigned long			idle_calls;
>  	unsigned long			idle_sleeps;
> -	int				idle_active;
>  	ktime_t				idle_entrytime;
>  	ktime_t				idle_waketime;
>  	ktime_t				idle_exittime;
> @@ -62,7 +65,6 @@ struct tick_sched {
>  	unsigned long			last_jiffies;
>  	u64				next_timer;
>  	ktime_t				idle_expires;
> -	int				do_timer_last;
>  	atomic_t			tick_dep_mask;
>  };
>  
> 

So what about this?  And moving the duplicated piece of got_idle_tick
manipulation on top of it?

---
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] nohz: Gather tick_sched booleans under a common flag field

Optimize the space and leave plenty of room for further flags.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
[ rjw: Do not use __this_cpu_read() to access tick_stopped and add
       got_idle_tick to avoid overloading inidle ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c |   12 +++++++-----
 kernel/time/tick-sched.h |   12 ++++++++----
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.h
+++ linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.h
@@ -41,19 +41,24 @@ enum tick_nohz_mode {
  * @timer_expires:	Anticipated timer expiration time (in case sched tick is stopped)
  * @timer_expires_base:	Base time clock monotonic for @timer_expires
  * @do_timer_lst:	CPU was the last one doing do_timer before going idle
+ * @got_idle_tick:	Tick timer function has run with @inidle set
  */
 struct tick_sched {
 	struct hrtimer			sched_timer;
 	unsigned long			check_clocks;
 	enum tick_nohz_mode		nohz_mode;
+
+	unsigned int			inidle		: 1;
+	unsigned int			tick_stopped	: 1;
+	unsigned int			idle_active	: 1;
+	unsigned int			do_timer_last	: 1;
+	unsigned int			got_idle_tick	: 1;
+
 	ktime_t				last_tick;
 	ktime_t				next_tick;
-	int				inidle;
-	int				tick_stopped;
 	unsigned long			idle_jiffies;
 	unsigned long			idle_calls;
 	unsigned long			idle_sleeps;
-	int				idle_active;
 	ktime_t				idle_entrytime;
 	ktime_t				idle_waketime;
 	ktime_t				idle_exittime;
@@ -64,7 +69,6 @@ struct tick_sched {
 	u64				timer_expires_base;
 	u64				next_timer;
 	ktime_t				idle_expires;
-	int				do_timer_last;
 	atomic_t			tick_dep_mask;
 };
 
Index: linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -465,7 +465,9 @@ __setup("nohz=", setup_tick_nohz);
 
 bool tick_nohz_tick_stopped(void)
 {
-	return __this_cpu_read(tick_cpu_sched.tick_stopped);
+	struct tick_sched *ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
+
+	return ts->tick_stopped;
 }
 
 bool tick_nohz_tick_stopped_cpu(int cpu)
@@ -1014,8 +1016,8 @@ bool tick_nohz_idle_got_tick(void)
 {
 	struct tick_sched *ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
 
-	if (ts->inidle > 1) {
-		ts->inidle = 1;
+	if (ts->got_idle_tick) {
+		ts->got_idle_tick = 0;
 		return true;
 	}
 	return false;
@@ -1161,7 +1163,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_handler(struct clo
 	ktime_t now = ktime_get();
 
 	if (ts->inidle)
-		ts->inidle = 2;
+		ts->got_idle_tick = 1;
 
 	dev->next_event = KTIME_MAX;
 
@@ -1261,7 +1263,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart tick_sched_t
 	ktime_t now = ktime_get();
 
 	if (ts->inidle)
-		ts->inidle = 2;
+		ts->got_idle_tick = 1;
 
 	tick_sched_do_timer(now);
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ