[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1eb16c24-ef3b-2962-d216-57f66321035e@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 17:53:21 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
keescook@...omium.org, lauraa@...eaurora.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
thomas.lendacky@....com
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: A question of sleeping with interrupts are disabled in start_kernel()
Hello,
I have a question of the call path init/main.c:
init/main.c: start_kernel() ->
kernel/events/core.c: perf_pmu_register() ->
kernel/events/core.c: perf_event_init() ->
kernel/events/core.c: pmu_dev_alloc()
In this call path, start_kernel() calls local_irq_disable() to disable
the interrupt;
perf_pmu_register() calls mutex_lock() and idr_alloc(GFP_KERNEL), and
they can sleep;
pmu_dev_alloc() calls kzalloc(GFP_KERNEL), and it can sleep.
In my opinion, this code may sleep with interrupts are disabled.
I wonder why this code is okay?
Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists