lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ef1ceb1-395d-753f-1ea2-9affcf682147@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:47:18 +0530
From:   Gaurav Dhingra <gauravdhingra.gxyd@...il.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Mark Greer <mgreer@...malcreek.com>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Fix warning to limit chars per line

Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the patch.


On Friday 06 April 2018 10:52 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Mark Greer <mgreer@...malcreek.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 12:02:46AM +0530, Gaurav Dhingra wrote:
>>> Wrap comment to fix warning "prefer a maximum 75 chars per line"
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Dhingra <gauravdhingra.gxyd@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.h | 4 +++-
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.h b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.h
>>> index a1d5440..01838d9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.h
>>> @@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ enum {
>>>        NUM_CODEC_DAIS,
>>>   };
>>>
>>> -/* device_type should be same as defined in audio.h (Android media layer) */
>>> +/* device_type should be same as defined in audio.h
> This isn't the right way to write a multi-line comment. It should be like:
>
> /*
>   * XXXX
>   * XXXX
>   */
I sent in an updated patchset. Though I forgot to add 
viresh.kumar@...aro.org to "To" in mail. I tried to follow instructions 
described on https://kernelnewbies.org/FirstKernelPatch for updating my 
patch. Do you think I followed the instructions correctly? I was 
thinking may be I need to update the already sent patch by adding *new 
commit* to my already existing commit on that git branch, but instead I 
tried to do what I understood from the website I mentioned above.
>>> + * (Android media layer)
>>> + */
>>>   enum {
>>>        GBAUDIO_DEVICE_NONE                     = 0x0,
>>>        /* reserved bits */
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1
>> Hi Gaurav.
>>
>> Thank you for the patch, it looks fine to me.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Mark Greer <mgreer@...malcreek.com>

-- 
Gaurav Dhingra
(sent from Thunderbird email client)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ