lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180406143133.67f33d33@xps13>
Date:   Fri, 6 Apr 2018 14:31:33 +0200
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] mtd: nand: qcom: use the ecc strength from device
 parameter

Hi Abhishek,

On Wed,  4 Apr 2018 18:12:17 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
<absahu@...eaurora.org> wrote:

> Currently the driver uses the ECC strength specified in
> device tree. The ONFI or JEDEC device parameter page
> contains the ‘ECC correctability’ field which indicates the
> number of bits that the host should be able to correct per
> 512 bytes of data.

This is misleading. This field is not about the controller but rather
the chip requirements in terms of minimal strength for nominal use.

> The ecc correctability is assigned in
> chip parameter during device probe time. QPIC/EBI2 NAND
> supports 4/8-bit ecc correction. The Same kind of board
> can have different NAND parts so use the ecc strength
> from device parameter (if its non zero) instead of
> device tree.

That is not what you do.

What you do is forcing the strength to be 8-bit per ECC chunk if the
NAND chip requires at least 8-bit/chunk strength.

The DT property is here to force a strength. Otherwise, Linux will
propose to the NAND controller to use the minimum strength required by
the chip (from either the ONFI/JEDEC parameter page or from a static
table).

IMHO, you have two solutions:
1/ Remove these properties from the board DT (breaks DT backward
compatibility though);
2/ Create another DT for the board.

However, there is something to do in this driver: the strength chosen
should be limited to the controller capabilities (8-bit/512B if I
understand correctly). In this case you have two options: either you
limit the strength like the size [1] if (ecc->strength > 8); or you
just limit the maximum strength to 8 like this [2] and the core will
spawn a warning in the dmesg telling that the ECC strength used is
below the NAND chip requirements.

Thanks,
Miquèl

[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c#L2332
[2] http://code.bulix.org/nyf63w-315268


> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> index 563b759..8dd40de 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -2334,6 +2334,14 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct qcom_nand_host *host)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Read the required ecc strength from NAND device and overwrite
> +	 * the device tree ecc strength for devices which require
> +	 * ecc correctability bits >= 8
> +	 */
> +	if (chip->ecc_strength_ds >= 8)
> +		ecc->strength = 8;
> +
>  	wide_bus = chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16 ? true : false;
>  
>  	if (ecc->strength >= 8) {



-- 
Miquel Raynal, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ