linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.18 34/93] s390/qeth: lock read device while queueing next buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180406084226.422048110@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri,  6 Apr 2018 15:23:03 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 34/93] s390/qeth: lock read device while queueing next buffer

3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>


[ Upstream commit 17bf8c9b3d499d5168537c98b61eb7a1fcbca6c2 ]

For calling ccw_device_start(), issue_next_read() needs to hold the
device's ccwlock.
This is satisfied for the IRQ handler path (where qeth_irq() gets called
under the ccwlock), but we need explicit locking for the initial call by
the MPC initialization.

Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c |   16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -517,8 +517,7 @@ static inline int qeth_is_cq(struct qeth
 	    queue == card->qdio.no_in_queues - 1;
 }
 
-
-static int qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card)
+static int __qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card)
 {
 	int rc;
 	struct qeth_cmd_buffer *iob;
@@ -549,6 +548,17 @@ static int qeth_issue_next_read(struct q
 	return rc;
 }
 
+static int qeth_issue_next_read(struct qeth_card *card)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	spin_lock_irq(get_ccwdev_lock(CARD_RDEV(card)));
+	ret = __qeth_issue_next_read(card);
+	spin_unlock_irq(get_ccwdev_lock(CARD_RDEV(card)));
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static struct qeth_reply *qeth_alloc_reply(struct qeth_card *card)
 {
 	struct qeth_reply *reply;
@@ -1166,7 +1176,7 @@ static void qeth_irq(struct ccw_device *
 		return;
 	if (channel == &card->read &&
 	    channel->state == CH_STATE_UP)
-		qeth_issue_next_read(card);
+		__qeth_issue_next_read(card);
 
 	iob = channel->iob;
 	index = channel->buf_no;