[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180406084334.167293827@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:22:59 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 018/102] cpumask: Add helper cpumask_available()
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
commit f7e30f01a9e221067bb4b579e3cfc25cd2617467 upstream.
With CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y cpumask_var_t is a struct cpumask
pointer, otherwise a struct cpumask array with a single element.
Some code dealing with cpumasks needs to validate that a cpumask_var_t
is not a NULL pointer when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y. This is typically
done by performing the check always, regardless of the underlying type
of cpumask_var_t. This works in both cases, however clang raises a
warning like this when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n:
kernel/irq/manage.c:839:28: error: address of array
'desc->irq_common_data.affinity' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Werror,-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
Add the inline helper cpumask_available() which only performs the
pointer check if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>
Cc: Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170412182030.83657-1-mka@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -680,6 +680,11 @@ void alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_v
void free_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask);
void free_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask);
+static inline bool cpumask_available(cpumask_var_t mask)
+{
+ return mask != NULL;
+}
+
#else
typedef struct cpumask cpumask_var_t[1];
@@ -720,6 +725,11 @@ static inline void free_cpumask_var(cpum
static inline void free_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask)
{
}
+
+static inline bool cpumask_available(cpumask_var_t mask)
+{
+ return true;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK */
/* It's common to want to use cpu_all_mask in struct member initializers,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists