linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 034/102] mm/vmscan.c: fix unsequenced modification and access warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180406084336.435349772@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri,  6 Apr 2018 15:23:15 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 034/102] mm/vmscan.c: fix unsequenced modification and access warning

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>

commit f2f43e566a02a3bdde0a65e6a2e88d707c212a29 upstream.

Clang and its -Wunsequenced emits a warning

  mm/vmscan.c:2961:25: error: unsequenced modification and access to 'gfp_mask' [-Wunsequenced]
                  .gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask)),
                                        ^

While it is not clear to me whether the initialization code violates the
specification (6.7.8 par 19 (ISO/IEC 9899) looks like it disagrees) the
code is quite confusing and worth cleaning up anyway.  Fix this by
reusing sc.gfp_mask rather than the updated input gfp_mask parameter.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170510154030.10720-1-nick.desaulniers@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
[natechancellor: Adjust context due to abscence of 7dea19f9ee63]
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2966,7 +2966,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct z
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
-		.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask)),
+		.gfp_mask = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask),
 		.reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask),
 		.order = order,
 		.nodemask = nodemask,
@@ -2981,12 +2981,12 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct z
 	 * 1 is returned so that the page allocator does not OOM kill at this
 	 * point.
 	 */
-	if (throttle_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, zonelist, nodemask))
+	if (throttle_direct_reclaim(sc.gfp_mask, zonelist, nodemask))
 		return 1;
 
 	trace_mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin(order,
 				sc.may_writepage,
-				gfp_mask,
+				sc.gfp_mask,
 				sc.reclaim_idx);
 
 	nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
@@ -3749,16 +3749,15 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_
 	const unsigned long nr_pages = 1 << order;
 	struct task_struct *p = current;
 	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
-	int classzone_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask);
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.nr_to_reclaim = max(nr_pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
-		.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask)),
+		.gfp_mask = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask),
 		.order = order,
 		.priority = NODE_RECLAIM_PRIORITY,
 		.may_writepage = !!(node_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
 		.may_unmap = !!(node_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP),
 		.may_swap = 1,
-		.reclaim_idx = classzone_idx,
+		.reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask),
 	};
 
 	cond_resched();
@@ -3768,7 +3767,7 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_
 	 * and RECLAIM_UNMAP.
 	 */
 	p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE;
-	lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
+	lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(sc.gfp_mask);
 	reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
 	p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;