linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 069/102] arm64: capabilities: Handle duplicate entries for a capability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180406084341.167811426@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri,  6 Apr 2018 15:23:50 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
        Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 069/102] arm64: capabilities: Handle duplicate entries for a capability

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>

commit 67948af41f2e upstream.

Sometimes a single capability could be listed multiple times with
differing matches(), e.g, CPU errata for different MIDR versions.
This breaks verify_local_cpu_feature() and this_cpu_has_cap() as
we stop checking for a capability on a CPU with the first
entry in the given table, which is not sufficient. Make sure we
run the checks for all entries of the same capability. We do
this by fixing __this_cpu_has_cap() to run through all the
entries in the given table for a match and reuse it for
verify_local_cpu_feature().

Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org> [v4.9 backport]
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> [v4.9 backport]
Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Tested-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c |   44 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -969,6 +969,26 @@ static void __init setup_elf_hwcaps(cons
 			cap_set_elf_hwcap(hwcaps);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Check if the current CPU has a given feature capability.
+ * Should be called from non-preemptible context.
+ */
+static bool __this_cpu_has_cap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap_array,
+			       unsigned int cap)
+{
+	const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(preemptible()))
+		return false;
+
+	for (caps = cap_array; caps->desc; caps++)
+		if (caps->capability == cap &&
+		    caps->matches &&
+		    caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU))
+			return true;
+	return false;
+}
+
 void update_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps,
 			    const char *info)
 {
@@ -1037,8 +1057,9 @@ verify_local_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm
 }
 
 static void
-verify_local_cpu_features(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps)
+verify_local_cpu_features(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps_list)
 {
+	const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = caps_list;
 	for (; caps->matches; caps++) {
 		if (!cpus_have_cap(caps->capability))
 			continue;
@@ -1046,7 +1067,7 @@ verify_local_cpu_features(const struct a
 		 * If the new CPU misses an advertised feature, we cannot proceed
 		 * further, park the cpu.
 		 */
-		if (!caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU)) {
+		if (!__this_cpu_has_cap(caps_list, caps->capability)) {
 			pr_crit("CPU%d: missing feature: %s\n",
 					smp_processor_id(), caps->desc);
 			cpu_die_early();
@@ -1099,25 +1120,6 @@ static void __init setup_feature_capabil
 	enable_cpu_capabilities(arm64_features);
 }
 
-/*
- * Check if the current CPU has a given feature capability.
- * Should be called from non-preemptible context.
- */
-static bool __this_cpu_has_cap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap_array,
-			       unsigned int cap)
-{
-	const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps;
-
-	if (WARN_ON(preemptible()))
-		return false;
-
-	for (caps = cap_array; caps->desc; caps++)
-		if (caps->capability == cap && caps->matches)
-			return caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU);
-
-	return false;
-}
-
 extern const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[];
 
 bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int cap)