lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1522982629-7557-1-git-send-email-shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Apr 2018 10:43:49 +0800
From:   Shunyong Yang <shunyong.yang@...-semitech.com>
To:     <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC:     <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shunyong Yang <shunyong.yang@...-semitech.com>,
        Joey Zheng <yu.zheng@...-semitech.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: cppc_cpufreq: Initialize shared cpu's perf capabilities

When multiple cpus are related in one cpufreq policy, the first online
cpu will be chosen by default to handle cpufreq operations. Let's take
cpu0 and cpu1 as an example.

When cpu0 is offline, policy->cpu will be shifted to cpu1. Cpu1's perf
capabilities should be initialized. Otherwise, perf capabilities are 0s
and speed change can not take effect.

This patch copies perf capabilities of the first online cpu to other
shared cpus when policy shared type is CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY.

Cc: Joey Zheng <yu.zheng@...-semitech.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Shunyong Yang <shunyong.yang@...-semitech.com>
---

Changes in v3:
  -Remove unnecessary wrap per Kumar's comments.

Changes in v2:
  -Add unlikely in cpu comparison per Kumar's comments.
  -Fix coding style per Kumar's comments.

Changes in v1:
  -Drop RFC tag,
     The original RFC link,
     https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10299055/.

     This patch solves same issue as RFC above.

     Patch name is changed as code is too much different with RFC above.

  -Remove extra init() per Viresh Kumar's comments and only handle
   CPPC CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY case.

---
 drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index 8300a9fcb80c..8b432d6e846d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -167,9 +167,19 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		NSEC_PER_USEC;
 	policy->shared_type = cpu->shared_type;
 
-	if (policy->shared_type == CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY)
+	if (policy->shared_type == CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY) {
+		int i;
+
 		cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpu->shared_cpu_map);
-	else if (policy->shared_type == CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL) {
+
+		for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) {
+			if (unlikely(i == policy->cpu))
+				continue;
+
+			memcpy(&all_cpu_data[i]->perf_caps, &cpu->perf_caps,
+			       sizeof(cpu->perf_caps));
+		}
+	} else if (policy->shared_type == CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL) {
 		/* Support only SW_ANY for now. */
 		pr_debug("Unsupported CPU co-ord type\n");
 		return -EFAULT;
-- 
1.8.3.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists