lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201804062255.HEJ82361.FJOFHVtSLOMOQF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date:   Fri, 6 Apr 2018 22:55:03 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:     peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, osandov@...com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
        bot+abdba5bc6de135d7622f00756da97998425b6de5@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        axboe@...nel.dk, tom.leiming@...il.com, hare@...e.de, shli@...com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        mingo@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, knikanth@...e.de
Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in lo_ioctl

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:04:18PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > +	/* Temporary hack for handling lock imbalance. */
> > +	if (__mutex_owner(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex) == current)
> > +		mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> 
> ARGGH.. you didn't read the comment we put on that?
> 

Commit 5b52330bbfe63b33 ("audit: fix auditd/kernel connection state tracking")
is using __mutex_owner(). ;-)

Of course, regarding loop module, we will be able to add a flag variable
associated with lo->lo_ctl_mutex. But that will be done after we solved
the deadlock problem. I think whether we need to drop lo->lo_ctl_mutex is
not clear. Maybe

-	err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex, 1);
+	err = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);

on top of this patch and listen to the lockdep?

Commit f028f3b2f987ebc6 ("loop: fix circular locking in loop_clr_fd()") says

  A simple way to silence lockdep could be to mark the lo_ctl_mutex
  in ioctl to be a sub class, but this might mask some other real bugs.

and we are currently hitting a deadlock problem.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ