linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/32] fs: introduce new ->get_poll_head and ->poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180406045833.GW30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 6 Apr 2018 05:58:33 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/32] fs: introduce new ->get_poll_head and ->poll_mask
 methods

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 05:07:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> +  get_poll_head: Returns the struct wait_queue_head that poll, select,
> +  epoll or aio poll should wait on in case this instance only has single
> +  waitqueue.  Can return NULL to indicate polling is not supported,
> +  or a POLL* value using the POLL_TO_PTR helper in case a grave error
> +  occured and ->poll_mask shall not be called.

> +		if (IS_ERR(head))
> +			return PTR_TO_POLL(head);

> + * ->get_poll_head can return a __poll_t in the PTR_ERR, use these macros
> + * to return the value and recover it.  It takes care of the negation as
> + * well as off the annotations.
> + */
> +#define POLL_TO_PTR(mask)	(ERR_PTR(-(__force int)(mask)))

Uh-oh...
static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR(__force const void *ptr)
{
        return IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr);
}
#define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) unlikely((unsigned long)(void *)(x) >= (unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO)
#define MAX_ERRNO       4095

IOW, your trick relies upon arguments of PTR_TO_POLL being no greater
than 4095.  Now, consider
#define EPOLLRDHUP      (__force __poll_t)0x00002000
which is to say, 8192...

So anything that tries e.g. POLL_TO_PTR(EPOLLRDHUP | EPOLLERR) will be in
for a quiet unpleasant surprise...