lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 6 Apr 2018 11:54:41 -0400
From:   Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [patch] mm: memcg: make sure memory.events is uptodate when waking
 pollers fix

On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:53:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> 
> mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'memory_events_show':
> mm/memcontrol.c:5453:23: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
>       atomic_long_read(&memcg->memory_events[OOM_KILL]));
>                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Introduced by commit
> 
>   725844c87a0d ("mm: memcg: make sure memory.events is uptodate when waking pollers")

Ah, silly, I missed that warning. The below fixes it.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
---

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 04ea2b104ee2..9bac6dc26e09 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5199,8 +5199,7 @@ static int memory_events_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		   atomic_long_read(&memcg->memory_events[MEMCG_MAX]));
 	seq_printf(m, "oom %lu\n",
 		   atomic_long_read(&memcg->memory_events[MEMCG_OOM]));
-	seq_printf(m, "oom_kill %lu\n",
-		   atomic_long_read(&memcg->memory_events[OOM_KILL]));
+	seq_printf(m, "oom_kill %lu\n", memcg_sum_events(memcg, OOM_KILL));
 
 	return 0;
 }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ