[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180407010919.GB15890@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 18:09:19 -0700
From: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
shakeelb@...gle.com, stable@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mpe@...erman.id.au, mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] x86, pkeys: override pkey when moving away from
PROT_EXEC
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 05:47:29PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 04/06/2018 05:09 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> >> - /*
> >> - * Look for a protection-key-drive execute-only mapping
> >> - * which is now being given permissions that are not
> >> - * execute-only. Move it back to the default pkey.
> >> - */
> >> - if (vma_is_pkey_exec_only(vma) &&
> >> - (prot & (PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE))) {
> >> - return 0;
> >> - }
> >> +
> > Dave,
> > this can be simply:
> >
> > if ((vma_is_pkey_exec_only(vma) && (prot != PROT_EXEC))
> > return ARCH_DEFAULT_PKEY;
>
> Yes, but we're removing that code entirely. :)
Well :). my point is add this code and delete the other
code that you add later in that function.
RP
--
Ram Pai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists