[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180407155006.GA11256@fury>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 08:50:06 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To: João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...il.com>
Cc: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...lessm.com, Dun Hum <bitter.taste@....com>,
João Paulo Rechi Vita
<jprvita@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-wireless: Fix NULL pointer dereference
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:37:29PM -0700, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
> When the module is removed the led workqueue is destroyed in the remove
> callback, before the led device is unregistered from the led subsystem.
>
> This leads to a NULL pointer derefence when the led device is
> unregistered automatically later as part of the module removal cleanup.
> Bellow is the backtrace showing the problem.
>
Thanks João Paulo,
...
> Unregistering the led device on the remove callback before destroying the
> workqueue avoids this problem.
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196097
>
> Reported-by: Dun Hum <bitter.taste@....com>
> Signed-off-by: João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...lessm.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/asus-wireless.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wireless.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wireless.c
> index 343e12547660..ecd715c82de5 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wireless.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wireless.c
> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ static int asus_wireless_remove(struct acpi_device *adev)
> {
> struct asus_wireless_data *data = acpi_driver_data(adev);
>
> + devm_led_classdev_unregister(&adev->dev, &data->led);
> if (data->wq)
> destroy_workqueue(data->wq);
> return 0;
asus_wireless_add only calls devm_led_classdev_register() iff the workqueue is
successfully created. It seems like it would make sense to move the
devm_led_classdev_unregister() call within the 'if (data->wq)' condition block.
This should also cc stable.
Thanks,
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists