[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180407175427.GA23053@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 19:54:27 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.16 00/31] 4.16.1-stable review
On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 10:37:33PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> >> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> >> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
> >>
> >> Summary
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> kernel: 4.16.1-rc1
> >> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> >> git branch: linux-4.16.y
> >> git commit: 30380aa579224caf6a737160802151f466fe3953
> >> git describe: v4.16-32-g30380aa57922
> >> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.16-oe/build/v4.16-32-g30380aa57922
> >>
> >> No regressions (compared to build )
> >
> > Compared to what build? :)
>
> There is no previous build to compare.
> stable-rc 4.16 is the new build in our system.
> This build results will act as base line for coming up 4.16 builds.
Why were you all not testing 4.16-rc releases and the final 4.16.0
release? For some reason I thought you all were doing that.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists