[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFywfktB83dERzYaC1NCYxD+Lg+NRft5ypjmbbcM_qdxpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 13:08:43 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/gup_benchmark: handle gup failures
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> nr = get_user_pages_fast(addr, nr, gup->flags & 1, pages + i);
> - i += nr;
> + if (nr > 0)
> + i += nr;
Can we just make this robust while at it, and just make it
if (nr <= 0)
break;
instead? Then it doesn't care about zero vs negative error, and
wouldn't get stuck in an endless loop if it got zero.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists