lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180408125534.7c448b0e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 12:55:34 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
Hi Al,
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 03:19:56 +0100 Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > > 92afc556e622 ("buffer.c: call thaw_super during emergency thaw")
> > >
> > > I have reverted that commit for today.
> >
> > I am still doing that revert ...
>
> That's interesting, seeing that this commit is *not* in #for-next and
> 08fdc8a0138a should not have that problem...
I do the revert by applying a reverse patch (initially generated by a
"git revert"). That reverse patch still applies cleanly, so I have no
easy way to tell that this problem has been fixed (except by trying
without the reverse patch each day - which would add a significant cost
to my work as that patch touches linux/fs.h).
Anyway, thanks for letting me know, I will remove the reverse patch
from tomorrow.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists