lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180408031912.GA24737@ming.t460p> Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 11:19:13 +0800 From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 11:49:47PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Ming Lei wrote: > > > > > > I will post V4 soon by using cpu_present_mask in the 1st stage irq spread. > > > And it should work fine for Kashyap's case in normal cases. > > > > No need to resend. I've changed it already and will push it out after > > lunch. > > No. Lunch did not last that long :) > > I pushed out the lot to > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git irq/core > > Please double check the modifications I did. The first related commit fixes > an existing error handling bug. I think your modification is better, especially about adding comment in irq_create_affinity_masks(). I also testes these patches again, and they just work fine. Thanks, Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists