[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180408031912.GA24737@ming.t460p>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 11:19:13 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online
CPUs as far as possible
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 11:49:47PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Ming Lei wrote:
> > >
> > > I will post V4 soon by using cpu_present_mask in the 1st stage irq spread.
> > > And it should work fine for Kashyap's case in normal cases.
> >
> > No need to resend. I've changed it already and will push it out after
> > lunch.
>
> No. Lunch did not last that long :)
>
> I pushed out the lot to
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git irq/core
>
> Please double check the modifications I did. The first related commit fixes
> an existing error handling bug.
I think your modification is better, especially about adding comment in
irq_create_affinity_masks().
I also testes these patches again, and they just work fine.
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists