linux-kernel - Re: Use struct page for filename

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180408044152.GG30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 8 Apr 2018 05:42:09 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Use struct page for filename

On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 08:16:46PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:33:36PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:24 PM, syzbot
> > <syzbot+75397ee3df5c70164154@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> > > cache_from_obj: Wrong slab cache. names_cache but object is from kmalloc-96
> > 
> > Al, do you see how this can happen?
> 
> I don't see how it happened, but when looking at this bug, I thought
> "This is very complicated, I think there's a simpler way to handle this".
> 
> Here's a proposal.  It won't apply to any existing tree (depends on a
> couple of local commits), but I think you'll get the general flavour
> of it.  It's mostly compile-tested (build still running, but fs/ and
> kernel/ compiled without issue).

> +struct audit_names;
> +
> +struct filename {
> +	const char		*name;	/* pointer to actual string */
> +	const __user char	*uptr;	/* original userland pointer */
> +	struct audit_names	*aname;
> +};
>  
>  /*
>   * Each physical page in the system has a struct page associated with
> @@ -188,6 +195,7 @@ struct page {
>  			spinlock_t ptl;
>  #endif
>  		};
> +		struct filename filename;
>  	};

Oh, lovely - extra 24 bytes into each struct page.  Plus the delta to
performance due to switching from kmem_cache_alloc to alloc_page.
Negative one, that is...