linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] syscalls: clean up stub naming convention

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180409064511.ejhfqcurtlq2srq5@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Apr 2018 08:45:11 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] syscalls: clean up stub naming convention


* Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:35:50AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >   - _____sys_waitid()      # ridiculous number of underscores?
> >   - __sys_waitid()         # too generic sounding?
> 
> ... and we'd need to rename internal helpers in net/
> 
> >   - __inline_sys_waitid()  # too long?
> 
> sounds acceptable, though a bit long (especially for the compat case, though
> it doesn't really matter in the case of 
> __inline_compat_sys_sched_rr_get_interval)

So as per the previous mail this is not just an inline function, but an active 
type conversion wrapper that sign-extends 32-bit ints to longs, which is important 
on some 64-bit architectures.

And that's a really non-obvious property IMO, and the name should probably reflect 
_that_ non-obvious property, not the inlining property which is really just a 
small detail.

I.e. how about:

	__se_sys_waitid()

... where 'se' stands for sign-extended, with a comment in the macro that explains 
the prefix? (The historical abbreviation for sign extension is 'sext', which I 
think wouldn't really be suitable these days.)

Thanks,

	Ingo