[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180409075342.GB7671@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:23:42 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] PM / Domain: Add struct device to genpd
On 22-03-18, 11:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 22 March 2018 at 10:59, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On 22-03-18, 10:30, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> On 22 December 2017 at 08:26, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> >> > + ret = device_add(&genpd->dev);
> >>
> >> What's the point of adding the device? Can we skip this step, as I
> >> guess the opp core is only using the device as cookie rather actual
> >> using it? No?
> >
> > We also use it for the OPP debugfs stuff, so that would be required I believe.
>
> Right, however, isn't that only using the dev_name(dev), which you
> don't need to add the device to make use of.
>
> Or maybe I missing something around this...
So I tested this bit. The code works fine even if the device isn't added
(registered), but this looks a bit sloppy to attempt.
Please let me know what would you prefer in this case, add the device or not.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists