[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa305cce-1244-45cb-267d-565f1f95b0e8@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:10:06 +0530
From: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Odelu Kukatla <okukatla@...eaurora.org>,
Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: qcom: gdsc: Add support to poll for higher
timeout value
Hello Stephen,
Thanks for the review comments.
On 4/6/2018 4:54 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-04-02 03:45:44)
>> From: Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> For some gdscs, it might take longer time up to 500us for
>> updating their status. So add support for the same by
>> defining a new flag 'GDS_TIMEOUT' to mark such gdsc in
>> order to poll their status for longer timeout value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>
> Let's just increase the timeout to 500 if it's required? This is a
> timeout, so we're not really expecting to hit it anyway so optimizing
> the uncommon case is not useful.
> --
Will fix this in the next series.
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists