linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180409094001.GZ4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:40:01 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
        Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@....com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point
 indicator


(I know there is a new version out; but I was reading through this to
catch up with the discussion)

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 09:43:09AM +0000, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> +static inline int sd_overutilized(struct sched_domain *sd)
> +{
> +	return READ_ONCE(sd->shared->overutilized);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void update_overutilized_status(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	struct sched_domain *sd;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	sd = rcu_dereference(rq->sd);
> +	if (sd && !sd_overutilized(sd) && cpu_overutilized(rq->cpu))
> +		WRITE_ONCE(sd->shared->overutilized, 1);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +#else

I think you ought to go have a look at the end of
kernel/sched/topology.c:sd_init(), where it says:

	/*
	 * For all levels sharing cache; connect a sched_domain_shared
	 * instance.
	 */
	if (sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES) {
		sd->shared = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sds, sd_id);
		atomic_inc(&sd->shared->ref);
		atomic_set(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus, sd_weight);
	}

Because if I read all this correctly, your code assumes sd->shared
exists unconditionally, while the quoted bit only ensures it does so <=
LLC.