[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <90d2fc35-0d58-1cab-a474-642192c7e1ff@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 19:02:02 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, acme@...nel.org,
ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, alexis.berlemont@...il.com,
corbet@....net, dan.j.williams@...el.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, kjlx@...pleofstupid.com,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
milian.wolff@...b.com, mingo@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pc@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
jglisse@...hat.com,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] trace_uprobe/sdt: Fix multiple update of same
reference counter
Hi Oleg,
On 04/09/2018 06:47 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/04, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>> +static void sdt_add_mm_list(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct mm_struct *mm)
>> +{
>> + struct mmu_notifier *mn;
>> + struct sdt_mm_list *sml = kzalloc(sizeof(*sml), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> + if (!sml)
>> + return;
>> + sml->mm = mm;
>> + list_add(&(sml->list), &(tu->sml.list));
>> +
>> + /* Register mmu_notifier for this mm. */
>> + mn = kzalloc(sizeof(*mn), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!mn)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + mn->ops = &sdt_mmu_notifier_ops;
>> + __mmu_notifier_register(mn, mm);
>> +}
> I didn't read this version yet, just one question...
>
> So now it depends on CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER, yes? I do not see any changes in Kconfig
> files, this doesn't look right...
Yes, you are write. I'll make CONFIG_UPROBE_EVENTS dependent on
CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER.
Thanks,
Ravi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists