[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2255884.b1SkkUdh3X@diego>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 17:55:40 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@...euvizoso.net>,
Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jcliang@...omium.org,
simon xue <xxm@...k-chips.com>, tfiga@...omium.org,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>,
Yakir Yang <kuankuan.y@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Liang Chen <cl@...k-chips.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>,
Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Jacob Chen <jacob-chen@...wrt.com>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rocky Hao <rocky.hao@...k-chips.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Nickey Yang <nickey.yang@...k-chips.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Mark Yao <markyao0591@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/14] ARM: dts: rockchip: add clocks in iommu nodes
Am Montag, 9. April 2018, 17:53:01 CEST schrieb Robin Murphy:
> On 09/04/18 16:44, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Hi Tomeu,
> >
> > Am Montag, 9. April 2018, 16:41:56 CEST schrieb Tomeu Vizoso:
> >> in today's linux-next, the DRM driver fails to probe because the iommu
> >> driver fails to find the aclk. I need to apply this patch for things
> >> to work again.
> >
> > Thanks for catching that issue.
> >
> > This seems to expose a backwards-compatibility issue, as this breaks
> > all old devicetrees, so should get a proper fix, apart from me applying
> > the dt-patch I missed.
> >
> > Looking at the iommu-clock-handling patch, I imagine this part as
> > the culprit:
> >
> > + iommu->num_clocks = ARRAY_SIZE(rk_iommu_clocks);
> > + iommu->clocks = devm_kcalloc(iommu->dev, iommu->num_clocks,
> > + sizeof(*iommu->clocks), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!iommu->clocks)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > The clk-bulk functions seem to work with simple for loops and
> > should (as the other standard clock functions) just work fine with
> > an empty struct, so I guess a simple
> >
> > if (!iommu->clocks && iommu->num_clocks > 0)
> >
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > should hopefully be enough. I'll try to give this a test later on
> > if nobody beats me to it :-)
>
> But iommu->num_clocks is clearly set to a nonzero compile-time constant
> at this point ;)
>
> I'd assume it's the return from devm_clk_bulk_get() which needs to
> special-case the "no clocks found" case from any other error, and *then*
> blat num_clocks to 0 if so.
you're right of course. Looking at it again, I now clearly see the ARRAY_SIZE
and am wondering what made me think num_clocks would be runtime-read.
Must be those 25°C today ;-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists