linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.4 066/162] veth: Be more robust on network device creation when no attributes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180409002738.163941-66-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Apr 2018 00:28:30 +0000
From:   Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
To:     "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.4 066/162] veth: Be more robust on network
 device creation when no attributes

From: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 191cdb3822e5df6b3c8b9f8cb8c4bf93f6cc90c7 ]

There are number of problems with configuration peer
network device in absence of IFLA_VETH_PEER attributes
where attributes for main network device shared with
peer.

First it is not feasible to configure both network
devices with same MAC address since this makes
communication in such configuration problematic.

This case can be reproduced with following sequence:

  # ip link add address 02:11:22:33:44:55 type veth
  # ip li sh
  ...
  26: veth0@...h1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,M-DOWN> mtu 1500 qdisc \
  noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT qlen 1000
      link/ether 00:11:22:33:44:55 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  27: veth1@...h0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,M-DOWN> mtu 1500 qdisc \
  noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT qlen 1000
      link/ether 00:11:22:33:44:55 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

Second it is not possible to register both main and
peer network devices with same name, that happens
when name for main interface is given with IFLA_IFNAME
and same attribute reused for peer.

This case can be reproduced with following sequence:

  # ip link add dev veth1a type veth
  RTNETLINK answers: File exists

To fix both of the cases check if corresponding netlink
attributes are taken from peer_tb when valid or
name based on rtnl ops kind and random address is used.

Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
---
 drivers/net/veth.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
index 6b4cc1c2e6b4..5446a1b6480c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/veth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int veth_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
 		tbp = tb;
 	}
 
-	if (tbp[IFLA_IFNAME]) {
+	if (ifmp && tbp[IFLA_IFNAME]) {
 		nla_strlcpy(ifname, tbp[IFLA_IFNAME], IFNAMSIZ);
 		name_assign_type = NET_NAME_USER;
 	} else {
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int veth_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
 		return PTR_ERR(peer);
 	}
 
-	if (tbp[IFLA_ADDRESS] == NULL)
+	if (!ifmp || !tbp[IFLA_ADDRESS])
 		eth_hw_addr_random(peer);
 
 	if (ifmp && (dev->ifindex != 0))
-- 
2.15.1