linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 087/293] rds: tcp: Set linger when rejecting an incoming conn in rds_tcp_accept

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180409002239.163177-87-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Apr 2018 00:24:02 +0000
From:   Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
To:     "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.9 087/293] rds: tcp: Set linger when rejecting
 an incoming conn in rds_tcp_accept_one

From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>

[ Upstream commit 10beea7d7408d0b1c9208757f445c5c710239e0e ]

Each time we get an incoming SYN to the RDS_TCP_PORT, the TCP
layer accepts the connection and then the rds_tcp_accept_one()
callback is invoked to process the incoming connection.

rds_tcp_accept_one() may reject the incoming syn for a number of
reasons, e.g., commit 1a0e100fb2c9 ("RDS: TCP: Force every connection
to be initiated by numerically smaller IP address"), or because
we are getting spammed by a malicious node that is triggering
a flood of connection attempts to RDS_TCP_PORT. If the incoming
syn is rejected, no data would have been sent on the TCP socket,
and we do not need to be in TIME_WAIT state, so we set linger on
the TCP socket before closing, thereby closing the socket efficiently
with a RST.

Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Tested-by: Imanti Mendez <imanti.mendez@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
---
 net/rds/tcp_listen.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/rds/tcp_listen.c b/net/rds/tcp_listen.c
index 185a56b1e29c..1bdf1932c8bf 100644
--- a/net/rds/tcp_listen.c
+++ b/net/rds/tcp_listen.c
@@ -116,6 +116,17 @@ struct rds_tcp_connection *rds_tcp_accept_one_path(struct rds_connection *conn)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static void rds_tcp_set_linger(struct socket *sock)
+{
+	struct linger no_linger = {
+		.l_onoff = 1,
+		.l_linger = 0,
+	};
+
+	kernel_setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_LINGER,
+			  (char *)&no_linger, sizeof(no_linger));
+}
+
 int rds_tcp_accept_one(struct socket *sock)
 {
 	struct socket *new_sock = NULL;
@@ -198,7 +209,13 @@ int rds_tcp_accept_one(struct socket *sock)
 	ret = 0;
 	goto out;
 rst_nsk:
-	/* reset the newly returned accept sock and bail */
+	/* reset the newly returned accept sock and bail.
+	 * It is safe to set linger on new_sock because the RDS connection
+	 * has not been brought up on new_sock, so no RDS-level data could
+	 * be pending on it. By setting linger, we achieve the side-effect
+	 * of avoiding TIME_WAIT state on new_sock.
+	 */
+	rds_tcp_set_linger(new_sock);
 	kernel_sock_shutdown(new_sock, SHUT_RDWR);
 	ret = 0;
 out:
-- 
2.15.1