linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.15 015/189] KVM: s390: use created

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180409001637.162453-15-alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Apr 2018 00:16:56 +0000
From:   Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
To:     "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.15 015/189] KVM: s390: use created_vcpus in more
 places

From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 241e3ec0faf5ab1a0d9b1f6c43eefa919fb9c112 ]

commit a03825bbd0c3 ("KVM: s390: use kvm->created_vcpus") introduced
kvm->created_vcpus to avoid races with the existing kvm->online_vcpus
scheme. One place was "forgotten" and one new place was "added".
Let's fix those.

Reported-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Fixes: 4e0b1ab72b8a ("KVM: s390: gs support for kvm guests")
Fixes: a03825bbd0c3 ("KVM: s390: use kvm->created_vcpus")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 004684eaa827..50193cbc819a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enable_cap *cap)
 	case KVM_CAP_S390_GS:
 		r = -EINVAL;
 		mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
-		if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)) {
+		if (kvm->created_vcpus) {
 			r = -EBUSY;
 		} else if (test_facility(133)) {
 			set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_mask, 133);
@@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_processor_feat(struct kvm *kvm,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
-	if (!atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)) {
+	if (!kvm->created_vcpus) {
 		bitmap_copy(kvm->arch.cpu_feat, (unsigned long *) data.feat,
 			    KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_NR_BITS);
 		ret = 0;
-- 
2.15.1