[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5CDY5p8oBz4QC5f6GsKiiYqdenCHGCqKhuWn10JwKjOpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 04:22:09 +0000
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: "list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <joro@...tes.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/4] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support
Hi Will, Robin,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 7:22 PM Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
wrote:
> This series provides the support for turning on the arm-smmu's
> clocks/power domains using runtime pm. This is done using the
> recently introduced device links patches, which lets the smmu's
> runtime to follow the master's runtime pm, so the smmu remains
> powered only when the masters use it.
> As not all implementations support clock/power gating, we are checking
> for a valid 'smmu->dev's pm_domain' to conditionally enable the runtime
> power management for such smmu implementations that can support it.
> This series also adds support for Qcom's arm-smmu-v2 variant that
> has different clocks and power requirements.
> Took some reference from the exynos runtime patches [1].
> With conditional runtime pm now, we avoid touching dev->power.lock
> in fastpaths for smmu implementations that don't need to do anything
> useful with pm_runtime.
> This lets us to use the much-argued pm_runtime_get_sync/put_sync()
> calls in map/unmap callbacks so that the clients do not have to
> worry about handling any of the arm-smmu's power.
> Previous version of this patch series is @ [5].
> [v11]
> * Some more cleanups for device link. We don't need an explicit
> delete for device link from the driver, but just set the flag
> DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE.
> device_link_add() API description says -
> "If the DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE is set, the link will be removed
> automatically when the consumer device driver unbinds."
> * Addressed the comments for 'smmu' in arm_smmu_map/unmap().
> * Dropped the patch [10] that introduced device_link_del_dev() API.
As far as I can see, this version addresses all the earlier comments. Do
you think this is something that you could apply?
Best regards,
Tomasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists