linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.15 157/168] net/mlx5e: Dont override vport admin link state in switchdev mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180410212807.770093779@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:24:59 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...lanox.com>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.15 157/168] net/mlx5e: Dont override vport admin link state in switchdev mode

4.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...lanox.com>


The vport admin original link state will be re-applied after returning
back to legacy mode, it is not right to change the admin link state value
when in switchdev mode.

Use direct vport commands to alter logical vport state in netdev
representor open/close flows rather than the administrative eswitch API.

Fixes: 20a1ea674783 ('net/mlx5e: Support VF vport link state control for SRIOV switchdev mode')
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c |   11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
@@ -611,7 +611,6 @@ static int mlx5e_rep_open(struct net_dev
 	struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
 	struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = priv->ppriv;
 	struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep = rpriv->rep;
-	struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = priv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
 	int err;
 
 	mutex_lock(&priv->state_lock);
@@ -619,8 +618,9 @@ static int mlx5e_rep_open(struct net_dev
 	if (err)
 		goto unlock;
 
-	if (!mlx5_eswitch_set_vport_state(esw, rep->vport,
-					  MLX5_ESW_VPORT_ADMIN_STATE_UP))
+	if (!mlx5_modify_vport_admin_state(priv->mdev,
+			MLX5_QUERY_VPORT_STATE_IN_OP_MOD_ESW_VPORT,
+			rep->vport, MLX5_ESW_VPORT_ADMIN_STATE_UP))
 		netif_carrier_on(dev);
 
 unlock:
@@ -633,11 +633,12 @@ static int mlx5e_rep_close(struct net_de
 	struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
 	struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = priv->ppriv;
 	struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep = rpriv->rep;
-	struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = priv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
 	int ret;
 
 	mutex_lock(&priv->state_lock);
-	(void)mlx5_eswitch_set_vport_state(esw, rep->vport, MLX5_ESW_VPORT_ADMIN_STATE_DOWN);
+	mlx5_modify_vport_admin_state(priv->mdev,
+			MLX5_QUERY_VPORT_STATE_IN_OP_MOD_ESW_VPORT,
+			rep->vport, MLX5_ESW_VPORT_ADMIN_STATE_DOWN);
 	ret = mlx5e_close_locked(dev);
 	mutex_unlock(&priv->state_lock);
 	return ret;