[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180410212912.530443736@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:24:39 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 089/138] x86/microcode/intel: Check microcode revision before updating sibling threads
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
commit c182d2b7d0ca48e0d6ff16f7d883161238c447ed upstream.
After updating microcode on one of the threads of a core, the other
thread sibling automatically gets the update since the microcode
resources on a hyperthreaded core are shared between the two threads.
Check the microcode revision on the CPU before performing a microcode
update and thus save us the WRMSR 0x79 because it is a particularly
expensive operation.
[ Borislav: Massage changelog and coding style. ]
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Tested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-2-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-3-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -589,6 +589,17 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct
if (!mc)
return 0;
+ /*
+ * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive
+ * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode
+ * already.
+ */
+ rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
+ if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) {
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
+ return UCODE_OK;
+ }
+
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
@@ -776,7 +787,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_
{
struct microcode_intel *mc;
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c;
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
static int prev_rev;
u32 rev;
@@ -793,6 +804,18 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_
return UCODE_NFOUND;
}
+ /*
+ * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive
+ * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode
+ * already.
+ */
+ rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
+ if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) {
+ uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
+ c->microcode = rev;
+ return UCODE_OK;
+ }
+
/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
@@ -813,8 +836,6 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_
prev_rev = rev;
}
- c = &cpu_data(cpu);
-
uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
c->microcode = rev;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists