[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180410065734.4883-1-yuval.shaia@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:57:34 +0300
From: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
keescook@...omium.org, pombredanne@...b.com,
yuval.shaia@...cle.com, bp@...e.de, abbotti@....co.uk,
rdunlap@...radead.org, bhe@...hat.com,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] linux/kernel.h: Fix minor type in comment
Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>
---
include/linux/kernel.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index ce51455e2adf..a5b4ba3bdb61 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ do { \
* your code. (Extra memory is used for special buffers that are
* allocated when trace_printk() is used.)
*
- * A little optization trick is done here. If there's only one
+ * A little optimization trick is done here. If there's only one
* argument, there's no need to scan the string for printf formats.
* The trace_puts() will suffice. But how can we take advantage of
* using trace_puts() when trace_printk() has only one argument?
--
2.14.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists