linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/10] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <380836701.aBTtZlsN1h@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:03:43 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Thomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@...dresden.de>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/10] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework

On Monday, April 9, 2018 5:58:32 PM CEST Thomas Ilsche wrote:
> 
> --------------ms020002070802070802040704
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> Content-Language: en-US
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> On 2018-04-08 18:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The v9 along with some cleanups suggested by Frederic on top of it and =
> with
> > ACKs from Peter (obtained on IRC) is now available from the pm-cpuidle =
> branch
> > in the linux-pm.git tree.
> >=20
> > It has been added to my linux-next branch, so it probably will be picke=
> d up by
> > linux-next tomorrow and I have a plan to push it for v4.17 in the secon=
> d half
> > of the next week unless a major issue with it is found in the meantime.=
> 
> 
> Great to hear that. Thanks for all your work.

You're very welcome!

> I'm finishing up some analysis of corner cases, but nothing major.
> So I'm glad to see this is moving along. I've been nitpicking a lot,
> but this is clearly a huge improvement and there are practical
> limitations against a theoretically perfect solution. In any case the
> changes will also make future policy adaptions much easier.

Thanks for your feedback, it would have taken much more time to get to this
point without it.

Thanks,
Rafael